Movemental

Theme 2 of 6

Polycentric Leadership

Five equippers lead together, and the church relinquishes control.

Who is at the center of the church you serve?

Who is at the center of the church you serve?

Who is at the center of the church you serve?

✦
Rather he reveals to us a polycentric structure, where leaders interrelate and incarnate the various purposes of Christ in such a way that the entire body is activated to service and matures in love.
—
JR Woodward

Overview

Polycentric leadership, for JR Woodward, is how a church lives when many centers of leadership interrelate. In Creating a Missional Culture, chapter 4, he imagines a pastor who could return to A.D. 60 and ask Paul about the church they serve. Ephesians is the letter he opens. He calls it one of Paul's last general letters, and he reads it as an account of the church as a sign, foretaste, and instrument of God's kingdom. Watchman Nee had gathered the letter into three words, sit, walk, stand. Woodward keeps that order and that flow.

Sit is the opening gift. God has chosen a people, adopted them, and seated them with Christ. They have a place at his table. Walk begins after that sitting. Paul tells the community to get up and live in light of what God has done from the foundation of the world. Stand is what that life meets. When the church sets out to make right what is wrong, opposition comes, and Woodward says the church learns to rely on God's power.

The masterpiece in Ephesians 2:10 is the church, the we, a collective whole on the canvas. Christ gives equippers, apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors, and teachers, so the body can grow up. Woodward calls them cultural architects. Edgar Schein, whom he cites, distinguishes leaders who create and change culture from management and administration, which act within culture. The five leading together are the polycentric structure. He wants power distributed and truth embodied in the congregation's life. A centralized leadership structure, he contends, never should have characterized the church in the first place.

Relinquishing control is the cost of that shape. Chapter 9 sets Jesus at the center, tells the starfish account of peer-shaped organizations, and records a dinner where Swiss friends described seven presidents sharing one government. Chapter 8 says a leader with no peer is isolated by the office, and that a co-leader in Los Angeles let him split the pain. Chapter 19 asks a team to write out the senior role and share it, to rotate who leads, and to decide by listening for the Spirit.

The Church as Movement, coauthored with Dan White Jr., adds his confession that he became the senior pastor he did not want imitated, and that the structure he had helped build was not neutral. Chapters 11 and 12 of The Scandal of Leadership enter this page only where imitation of Christ is his alternative to grasping status. The parts below stay Sit, Walk, and Stand. The five equippers are the company inside the walk.

The usual question:

Who is at the center of the church you serve?

The better question:

Who is at the center of the church you serve?

The framework

The idea

Woodward takes the flow of Ephesians from Watchman Nee and keeps three words in Nee's order: sit, walk, stand. Inside that flow, polycentric leadership is the five equippers leading together. In chapter 4 he names them as Christ gives them: apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors, and teachers. They lead as one company of culture creators. Relinquishing the need to control belongs to the same vision. Chapters 9 and 19 treat control as something the leaders hand to the Spirit and to one another, so the whole body can mature. Sit, Walk, and Stand are the parts of this page, in that order. The five equippers stay inside the walk.
01

Sit

Chapter 4 opens the letter where Nee opened it. Sit comes first. Paul tells the church that God chose them to be with him, to be his adopted sons and daughters, and to be part of the new humanity he has created. Woodward's sentence is simple: we have been seated with Christ. We have a place at his table. Three chapters of Ephesians, as he counts them, are this sitting. The church seeks to understand God's plan and purpose from the foundation of the world before it is told to get up.

The masterpiece line belongs here, because the people who sit are a people, not a collection of private projects. Quoting Ephesians 2:10, he says we are God's masterpiece, created anew in Christ Jesus for the good things God planned long ago. Then he insists on the pronoun. When Paul says we are God's masterpiece, he is talking about the church. He refers to the collective whole. That is why Paul writes we, Woodward says, and not you. The canvas is the collection of souls in community. God paints. At the end of the work there is a masterpiece. Unity across ethnic, class, and age lines is one statement he says the world needs to see when Jesus is king of that community.

In The Church as Movement he reads the opening of John 13 as the reason a leader can wash feet: when we know who we are and whose we are, we have nothing to prove. In The Scandal of Leadership, chapter 12, he asks whether a leader has become possessed by their image, or whether they possess the identity they receive from God. He reads Philippians 2 as Christ refusing to exploit status. That question names the danger in the 2016 confession, a leader whose chief concern became his own image and his own kingdom. Sit, in chapter 4, is the prior gift. The table is Christ's. The people already have a place.

02

Walk

After the sitting, Paul tells the community to walk. Woodward locates the design of the masterpiece in that walk. Ephesians 4 begins with attitudes, then a common confession of one body, one Spirit, one hope, one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of all. Then Paul speaks of diverse gifts given so the church can grow into maturity and become like Christ. The gifts Woodward stresses are particular servants: apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors, and teachers. Christ gives people, he says, and not merely personal services. He understands the five, and the ministries they represent, as the mechanism for mission, ministry, and Christian maturity. Without that pattern, he writes, the church cannot mature into the masterpiece God intended. Immaturity in the Western church, and a body tossed by every wind of doctrine, is what he sees when these equippers have not been appreciated, understood, or nurtured.

The walk is polycentric. He borrows Suzanne Morse for the word: many centers of leadership that interrelate, a community that is widening its circles. Paul, he says, proposes neither a centralized structure nor a flat one. Leaders interrelate and incarnate the purposes of Christ so the entire body is activated to service and matures in love. The five together represent the full ministry of Jesus. Other gifts of the Spirit, the ones he points to in Romans 12, 1 Corinthians 12, and 1 Peter 4, are activated along the path of these equippers. Markus Barth's line, as Woodward uses it, is that the whole church is the clergy appointed for a ministry to and for the world.

Equippers are cultural architects. Schein's distinction, printed as the chapter's epigraph and quoted again in the body, is the one he wants leaders to remember: leaders create and change culture, while management and administration act within culture. Both God and the equippers have a part. Paul planted, Apollos watered, and God gives the growth. Some things only God can do. Some things God will not do, because he has called the church to do them. Power, in Woodward's reading of the letter, is distributed. Truth is embodied in the life of the community, in front of a culture already skeptical of both.

Chapter 19 shows the walk on a calendar. He tells a team to write out the senior or lead pastor's role and share it among the equippers, three or five. Half the year can follow the Christian calendar from Advent to Pentecost. The rest teaches what the church most needs in ordinary time. One series, four to eight weeks, belongs to each equipper's concern. When the series is evangelistic, the evangelist leads and the others follow. When it is pastoral, the pastor leads. People learn to lead in the way of Christ, and leaders learn to follow. Geese share the point because one bird cannot bear the front the whole way. He has found two or three primary communicators enough for the weekly gathering. Trust, he says, takes a history. The Trinity he names as the pattern is interdependent, communal, relational, participatory, self-surrendering, and self-giving.

Emotional health belongs on this walk. Chapter 8 says genuine shared leadership can help leaders pursue wholeness, while a senior or lead pastor is isolated by authority, title, and function, whether the pyramid is drawn with that person at the top or, in the name of servant leadership, at the bottom. No one has equal authority, so there is no peer. In a polycentric community, people with equal authority and revolving leadership pursue wholeness together and become the example the church catches. Leaders need that community. They preach Christ, he says, and they live with their weaknesses in the open.

03

Stand

is the third word, and Woodward keeps it last. As the church lives in the world for the sake of the world, and starts to make right what is wrong, it meets the forces of darkness and the enemy of what is good. At those times, he writes, we need to learn to rely on God's power to stand. The standing is God's. The church's work is to rely.

Chapter 19 names what that reliance costs. Leading as a community within the community requires death: death to preserving the status quo, to real and imagined fears, to power, to the ability to control, to status and reputation, and to a private idea of success. He sets Jesus' words beside that cost, the call to deny oneself, take up the cross, and follow. With Christ, he says, death means new life. Roland Allen's reading of Paul, which Woodward uses here, is that spontaneous activity is a movement of the Spirit, and we cannot control the Spirit. Paul planted and Apollos watered. God causes the growth. Allen's phrase for Paul's practice is retirement: Paul released control and moved on, often within about two years, so the new believers would rely on the Spirit apart from Paul's direct hand. Woodward's lesson is that missional leadership cedes control and teaches that reliance.

Polycentric leadership, in the same chapter, is one way to teach it. It is a team of equippers, and it is more than the team. Christ is the head. The Spirit may lead through the youngest Spirit-filled person in the room as truly as through a recognized equipper. Leader and follower are set by the Spirit. The equippers demonstrate how leadership rotates. Flat leadership, he says in the same breath, often falls flat. Standing is shared reliance, with a head who is not one of the equippers.

The 2023 chapters add imitation as the form of that relinquishment. In chapter 11 he presents Timothy as someone who had learned to show genuine concern for others' welfare, living for others because he belonged to Christ. In chapter 12 he says Jesus did not empty himself of power, and did not wield it in a worldly or coercive way. The practice he names is to refuse exploited status, to empty ourselves of an identity built on titles, and to obey in humility. This page leaves the wider argument of that book in its own theme. Here the point is narrow. Standing, when control is the temptation, looks like imitation of a Lord who already has the power and uses it for others.

Polycentric leadership recovers a church seated with Christ, walking by equippers who lead together, and standing in God's power with control relinquished.
Scripture

The Biblical Mandate

Ephesians, read as sit, walk, stand
Ephesians, as Nee summarized it and as Woodward follows it, gives this page its order. The church sits with Christ as God's masterpiece, a people. It walks by the five equippers Christ gives, leading together. It stands by relying on God's power when the work draws opposition. Power distributed and truth embodied are his summary of how the letter wants the good news to be lived.
Case studies

Stories from practice

Case Study

Seven presidents and a steak dinner

Exponential, a church planting conference in Orlando, then Woodward's own follow-up reading — Seven presidents and a steak dinner

After a talk, someone told him shared leadership would only work in small communities. At a steak dinner, Swiss friends described seven presidents who have shared the executive since 1848.
Case Study

Spider or starfish

Chapter 9 of *Creating a Missional Culture*, between the Latin American base communities and the Swiss dinner — Spider or starfish

He uses The Starfish and the Spider to ask whether a church dies when one head is removed, or lives because the life is repeated through the body.

Case Study

Split the pain

A Fuller Seminary course, then the first five years of church planting in Los Angeles — Split the pain

A planter's team mutinied and left him scarred. Woodward recognized his own hardest hits as emotional, and credited a co-leader of equal authority with splitting the pain.
Case Study

A meeting for worship for business

A conversation about a Quaker congregation near Portland, Oregon, and a regional meeting of several hundred — A meeting for worship for business

Business is held as worship. The clerk listens for a sense of the meeting. Woodward's conclusion is that a community of leaders is more likely to hear the Spirit than one person is.
Formation practices

Write out the senior role and share it

With the equippers you already have, write down what the senior or lead pastor currently decides, and give each piece to the person whose gift it matches.
Step 1

Step 1

List the decisions the senior or lead role still holds alone, including who teaches and what is taught.
Step 2

Step 2

Sit with the equippers, whether you have three or five, and assign those pieces across the team.
Step 3

Step 3

Build the next teaching year together: Advent to Pentecost for half the year, and what the church most needs for the rest.
Step 4

Step 4

Give one series of four to eight weeks to each equipper's concern. That person leads. The others follow.
Step 5

Step 5

Name two or three primary communicators for the weekly gathering, and say out loud why the others are not all in that chair.
Step 6

Step 6

Name one peer who shares real authority with you, or admit that no such peer exists yet.
Step 7

Step 7

If you have that person, set a conversation whose only agenda is the emotional cost of the last season.
Step 8

Step 8

Say one hit plainly, without turning it into a plan.
Step 9

Step 9

Ask them what they have been carrying, and do not fix it in the room.
Step 10

Step 10

If James 5:16 fits the trust you already have, confess one specific thing and pray.
Step 11

Step 11

Choose one decision that touches the whole congregation, not a routine ministry detail.
Step 12

Step 12

Ask each equipper to come ready to say what their gift is worried about.
Step 13

Step 13

Begin with silence long enough to listen, then let each person speak what they sense.
Step 14

Step 14

Look for a sense of the Spirit together. A block needs to be conscience, not taste.
Step 15

Step 15

Leave ministry-level decisions with the people who carry that work.
  1. If you could ask Paul, in the year 60, what he sees in the church you serve, what do you think he would say about where you sit? Where is your place at the table already given, before you pick up a title?

  2. Have you become possessed by your image, or do you possess the identity you receive from God? Which title would be costly to hold more lightly this month?

  3. Have you experienced polycentric leadership, and if you have, what was it like? If you have not, what has kept it off the table? Which of the five equippers is missing from the way you actually decide?

  4. How does the leadership structure you have now speak to people who are already skeptical of power? Who besides one pastor is trusted to create culture here?

  5. What makes you uncertain about polycentric leadership, and what makes you want it? Name one ego issue that closer community would surface.

  6. Where is decision-making gathered in one person, and what would shared equipping look like in that place? Which series this year could be led by someone who is not the usual voice?

  7. Does the church you serve operate more like a spider or a starfish? What would still live if one leader stepped aside for a season?

  8. Where can you begin to live into polycentric leadership, and what is the first step? Who is close enough in character to share one real responsibility now?

Resources

Resources for the journey

AI Lab

Ask how Sit, Walk, and Stand would look in the church you serve, with the equippers you actually have. You help a reader practice JR Woodward's theme Polycentric Leadership. Hold this question open: Who is at the center of the church you serve? The parts, in his order, are Sit, Walk, and Stand. Do not add a fourth part. Do not make the five culture creators the outline of the page. If you name them, keep his order: apostle, prophet, evangelist, pastor, teacher. They are the company inside the walk. Draw first on *Creating a Missional Culture* (InterVarsity Press, 2012), chapters 4, 8, 9, and 19. Use *The Church as Movement* (2016, with Dan White Jr.), chapter 2, for the confession and the three approaches, and attribute “I (JR)” to Woodward. Use *The Scandal of Leadership* (2023), chapters 11 and 12, only where imitation of Christ is the alternative to grasping status and control. Do not turn the conversation into the Powers theme. Quote him. Do not quote a long Bible translation. Cite the book by title and chapter. The Mercer ranks, the 2006 Alcoholics Anonymous counts, and Clinton's 70 percent belong only to the sources as he reports them. Ask about the reader's actual team, calendar, and decisions before you tell them to restructure, resign, or install a model. When they want a next action, point to writing out the senior role, telling a peer the emotional truth, seeking a sense of the Spirit on one decision, and the questions to sit with. Centralized control and the hero senior pastor are mistakes he names. Flat leadership is a third path he says falls flat.

  • Try: “Who is at the center of the church I serve?”
  • Try: “Where do our decisions still gather in one person?”
  • Try: “Which of the five equippers is silent in our year?”
  • Try: “What is the emotional cost of leading without a peer?”
  • Try: “Where would relinquishing control begin this month?”
Explore the AI Lab
Watch for distortion

Misreadings

One senior or lead pastor sits above associates, staff, and volunteers. Teaching, vision, and direction gather there. The chart looks normal, and people who are already wary of power read the chart as the message. In chapter 4 he says the cultural shifts around the church show the vulnerabilities of a centralized leadership structure, and he contends that this structure never should have characterized the church in the first place. The shift he asks for is toward equippers who live as cultural architects and cultivate a missional ethos that activates the priesthood of all believers. Paul, as he reads him, reveals a polycentric structure in which leaders interrelate so the whole body is activated and matures in love. Morse's line, which he quotes, is that successful communities broaden the circles of leadership until there are many centers that interrelate. The church is identified with one gifted leader. Staff meetings feel like a company with a chief executive. Success is counted in people, money, and building. When that person steps away, the meaningful life of the church seems to leave with them. In *The Church as Movement* he confesses that he became the senior pastor he did not want people to imitate. The collegiate church had grown large. He was asked to speak. Life became meetings. He felt himself becoming less like Jesus and more like the chief executive of a fast-growing company. On one occasion, with a clarity he says God gave him, his chief concern was his own image and the building of his own kingdom. He had helped set up the structure that fed the temptation, and he came to believe that being the solo senior leader was a large part of the problem. He also saw the same structure take godly people and make them less godly. His conclusion is that structure is not neutral. The correction he wrote toward is shared leadership, argued from the text and from the context, in *Creating a Missional Culture*. A team reacts to the hero chart by declaring that every voice weighs the same on every question. Meetings multiply. Direction thins. Someone still steers, only from the side, and calls the steering equality. He treats this as a real reaction, and he refuses it as the remedy. A flat approach, he writes, often falls flat. Where hierarchical leadership controls, flat leadership goes absent. Formation gets fuzzy. Mission stalls. In the name of flatness, all voices are given equal weight on all concerns, and the church either talks without going anywhere together or lives with passive-aggressive pressure on the vote. His line is that flat leadership is no leadership. The third way he argues for is polycentric: many centers, real authority, revolving lead, Christ at the head, the Spirit free to speak through more than the platform.

Centralized control is how a church must be led

One senior or lead pastor sits above associates, staff, and volunteers. Teaching, vision, and direction gather there. The chart looks normal, and people who are already wary of power read the chart as the message.

In chapter 4 he says the cultural shifts around the church show the vulnerabilities of a centralized leadership structure, and he contends that this structure never should have characterized the church in the first place. The shift he asks for is toward equippers who live as cultural architects and cultivate a missional ethos that activates the priesthood of all believers. Paul, as he reads him, reveals a polycentric structure in which leaders interrelate so the whole body is activated and matures in love. Morse's line, which he quotes, is that successful communities broaden the circles of leadership until there are many centers that interrelate.

The hero senior pastor

The church is identified with one gifted leader. Staff meetings feel like a company with a chief executive. Success is counted in people, money, and building. When that person steps away, the meaningful life of the church seems to leave with them.

In The Church as Movement he confesses that he became the senior pastor he did not want people to imitate. The collegiate church had grown large. He was asked to speak. Life became meetings. He felt himself becoming less like Jesus and more like the chief executive of a fast-growing company. On one occasion, with a clarity he says God gave him, his chief concern was his own image and the building of his own kingdom. He had helped set up the structure that fed the temptation, and he came to believe that being the solo senior leader was a large part of the problem. He also saw the same structure take godly people and make them less godly. His conclusion is that structure is not neutral. The correction he wrote toward is shared leadership, argued from the text and from the context, in Creating a Missional Culture.

Flat leadership is the fair correction

A team reacts to the hero chart by declaring that every voice weighs the same on every question. Meetings multiply. Direction thins. Someone still steers, only from the side, and calls the steering equality.

He treats this as a real reaction, and he refuses it as the remedy. A flat approach, he writes, often falls flat. Where hierarchical leadership controls, flat leadership goes absent. Formation gets fuzzy. Mission stalls. In the name of flatness, all voices are given equal weight on all concerns, and the church either talks without going anywhere together or lives with passive-aggressive pressure on the vote. His line is that flat leadership is no leadership. The third way he argues for is polycentric: many centers, real authority, revolving lead, Christ at the head, the Spirit free to speak through more than the platform.

Key terms

Pathway vocabulary

polycentric leadership
He takes the term from Suzanne Morse: communities broaden their circles until leadership is polycentric, with many centers that interrelate. In his reading of Paul, that structure is the five equippers leading together so the whole body is activated and matures. It is shared, revolving, and open to the Spirit speaking beyond the formal team. He distinguishes it from a single senior pastor and from a flat room in which leadership goes missing.
sit, walk, stand
Watchman Nee summed the letter in these three words. Sit: chosen, adopted, seated with Christ, a place at the table. Walk: the community gets up and lives in light of God's plan. Stand: when opposition comes, rely on God's power. Woodward says this is the flow of the letter, and this page keeps that order as its parts.
God's masterpiece
Quoting Ephesians 2:10, he says we are God's masterpiece, created anew in Christ Jesus for the good God planned. His gloss is that Paul means the church, the collective whole. The community is the canvas. The five equippers exist so that people can grow up into the masterpiece God intended.
power distributed
He says Paul encourages the church to embody the good news in a way where power is distributed. A centralized chart, in his argument, speaks badly to people already skeptical of power. Distribution shows up as equippers who share a senior role, as decisions pushed to the people who carry the work, and as a whole church understood to be in ministry.
truth embodied
Paired in his sentence with power distributed: the good news is embodied so that truth is lived, in a host culture skeptical of truth claims that stay on the platform. The equippers incarnate the purposes of Christ. The congregation's life is the statement.
relinquishing the need to control
The title of chapter 9, and the practice of chapter 19. Woodward uses Roland Allen's account of Paul, who released control and moved on so converts would rely on the Spirit. Leading as a community requires death to the ability to control. Polycentric leadership is how he teaches that reliance: Christ as head, leadership rotating, decisions discerned together.
About the author

About JR Woodward

JR Woodward

JR Woodward is a church planter, missiologist, and movement leader who has spent more than three decades establishing missional-incarnational communities across the United States. As the National Director of the V3 Church Planting Movement, co-founder of Missio Alliance and the P

Polycentric Leadership